Heliyon (Dec 2022)

Characterizing treatment resistance in muscle invasive bladder cancer using the chicken egg chorioallantoic membrane patient-derived xenograft model

  • Hugo Villanueva,
  • Gabrielle A. Wells,
  • Malachi T. Miller,
  • Mariana Villanueva,
  • Ravi Pathak,
  • Patricia Castro,
  • Michael M. Ittmann,
  • Andrew G. Sikora,
  • Seth P. Lerner

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 12
p. e12570

Abstract

Read online

Background: Non-metastatic muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC) has a poor prognosis and standard of care (SOC) includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) combined with cystectomy. Patients receiving NAC have at best <10% improvement in five-year overall survival compared to cystectomy alone. This major clinical problem underscores gaps in our understanding of resistance mechanisms and a need for reliable pre-clinical models. The chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) represents a rapid, scalable, and cost-effective alternative to immunocompromised mice for establishing patient-derived xenografts (PDX) in vivo. CAM-PDX leverages an easily accessible engraftment scaffold and vascular-rich, immunosuppressed environment for the engraftment of PDX tumors and subsequent functional studies. Methods: We optimized engraftment conditions for primary MIBC tumors using the CAM-PDX model and tested concordance between cisplatin-based chemotherapy response of patients to matching PDX tumors using tumor growth coupled with immunohistochemistry markers of proliferation and apoptosis. We also tested select kinase inhibitor response on chemotherapy-resistant bladder cancers on the CAM-PDX using tumor growth measurements and immuno-detection of proliferation marker, Ki-67. Results: Our results show primary, NAC-resistant, MIBC tumors grown on the CAM share histological characteristics along with cisplatin-based chemotherapy resistance observed in the clinic for matched parent human tumor specimens. Patient tumor specimens acquired after chemotherapy treatment (post-NAC) and exhibiting NAC resistance were engrafted successfully on the CAM and displayed decreased tumor growth size and proliferation in response to treatment with a dual EGFR and HER2 inhibitor, but had no significant response to either CDK4/6 or FGFR inhibition. Conclusions: Our data suggests concordance between cisplatin-based chemotherapy resistance phenotypes in primary patient tumors and CAM-PDX models. Further, proteogenomic informed kinase inhibitor use on MIBC CAM-PDX models suggests a benefit from integration of rapid in vivo testing of novel therapeutics to inform more complex, pre-clinical mouse PDX experiments for more effective clinical trial design aimed at achieving optimal precision medicine for patients with limited treatment options.

Keywords