Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (Jul 2024)

Prevalence of tick-borne bacterial pathogens in Germany—has the situation changed after a decade?

  • Katja Mertens-Scholz,
  • Katja Mertens-Scholz,
  • Bernd Hoffmann,
  • Jörn M. Gethmann,
  • Hanka Brangsch,
  • Mathias W. Pletz,
  • Christine Klaus

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1429667
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionTick-borne pathogens, such as Borreliella spp., Rickettsia spp., and Anaplasma spp., are frequently detected in Germany. They circulate between animals and tick vectors and can cause mild to severe diseases in humans. Knowledge about distribution and prevalence of these pathogens over time is important for risk assessment of human and animal health.MethodsIxodes ricinus nymphs were collected at different locations in 2009/2010 and 2019 in Germany and analyzed for tick-borne pathogens by real-time PCR and sequencing.ResultsBorreliella spp. were detected with a prevalence of 11.96% in 2009/2010 and 13.10% in 2019 with B. afzelii and B. garinii as dominant species. Borrelia miyamotoi was detected in seven ticks and in coinfection with B. afzelii or B. garinii. Rickettsia spp. showed a prevalence of 8.82% in 2009/2010 and 1.68% in 2019 with the exclusive detection of R. helvetica. The prevalence of Anaplasma spp. was 1.00% in 2009/2010 and 7.01% in 2019. A. phagocytophilum was detected in seven tick samples. None of the nymphs were positive for C. burnetii.DiscussionHere, observed changes in prevalence were not significant after a decade but require longitudinal observations including parameters like host species and density, climatic factors to improve our understanding of tick-borne diseases.

Keywords