Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy (Mar 2024)
Exploring the potential of fully automated LUMIPULSE G plasma assays for detecting Alzheimer’s disease pathology
Abstract
Abstract Background LUMIPULSE G-automated immunoassays represent a widely used method for the quantification of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Less invasive blood-based markers confer a promising tool for AD diagnosis at prodromal stages (mild cognitive impairment (MCI)). Highly sensitive assays for the quantification of amyloid-beta (Aβ) and phosphorylated Tau-181 (p-Tau181) in the blood are showing promising results. In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of the recently available fully automated LUMIPULSE plasma marker assays for detecting brain AD pathology and for predicting progression from MCI to AD dementia stage. Methods A retrospective exploratory cohort of 138 individuals (22 neurological controls [NC], 72 MCI, and 44 AD dementia patients) was included. Data regarding baseline CSF concentrations of Aβ42, Aβ40, t-Tau, and p-Tau181 was available and used to establish the presence of AD brain pathology. Baseline Aβ42, Aβ40, and p-Tau181 concentrations were determined in stored plasma samples using high-throughput fully automated LUMIPULSE assays. Progression from MCI to AD dementia was evaluated during follow-up (mean 6.4 ± 2.5 years). Moreover, a prospective validation cohort of 72 individuals with memory complaints underwent AD biomarker quantification, closely mirroring typical clinical practice. This cohort aimed to confirm the study’s main findings. Results In the exploratory cohort, correlations between CSF and plasma were moderate for p-Tau181 (ρ = 0.61, p < 0.001) and weak for Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (ρ = 0.39, p < 0.001). Plasma p-Tau181 and p-Tau181/Aβ42 concentrations were significantly increased while Aβ42/Aβ40 was significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in patients with AD dementia and prodromal AD, as well as in individuals with CSF abnormal amyloid concentrations (A +). Plasma p-Tau181 showed a robust performance in differentiating patients clinically diagnosed as AD (AUC = 0.89; 95% CI 0.83–0.94); A + vs. A − (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI 0.77–0.91) and also in predicting conversion to AD dementia in MCI patients (AUC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.96). When tested in the validation cohort, plasma p-Tau181 displayed 83.3% of the overall percentage of agreement according to amyloid status. Conclusions Our results show that the measurement of p-Tau181 in plasma has great potential as a non-invasive prognostic screening tool for implementation in a clinical setting.
Keywords
