Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier, Brussels 1200, Belgium; Defitech Chair for Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva 1202, Switzerland; Corresponding author
Gerard Derosiere
Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier, Brussels 1200, Belgium
Cecile Dubuc
Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier, Brussels 1200, Belgium
Aegryan Lete
Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier, Brussels 1200, Belgium
Frederic Crevecoeur
Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier, Brussels 1200, Belgium; Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve 1348, Belgium
Friedhelm C. Hummel
Defitech Chair for Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Geneva 1202, Switzerland; Defitech Chair for Clinical Neuroengineering, Center for Neuroprosthetics (CNP) and Brain Mind Institute (BMI), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Sion (EPFL), Sion 1951, Switzerland; Clinical Neuroscience, University of Geneva Medical School (HUG), Geneva 1202, Switzerland
Julie Duque
Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 53, Avenue Mounier, Brussels 1200, Belgium
Summary: Besides relying heavily on sensory and reinforcement feedback, motor skill learning may also depend on the level of motivation experienced during training. Yet, how motivation by reward modulates motor learning remains unclear. In 90 healthy subjects, we investigated the net effect of motivation by reward on motor learning while controlling for the sensory and reinforcement feedback received by the participants. Reward improved motor skill learning beyond performance-based reinforcement feedback. Importantly, the beneficial effect of reward involved a specific potentiation of reinforcement-related adjustments in motor commands, which concerned primarily the most relevant motor component for task success and persisted on the following day in the absence of reward. We propose that the long-lasting effects of motivation on motor learning may entail a form of associative learning resulting from the repetitive pairing of the reinforcement feedback and reward during training, a mechanism that may be exploited in future rehabilitation protocols.