Genome Medicine (Feb 2024)

An atlas of cell-type-specific interactome networks across 44 human tumor types

  • Zekun Li,
  • Gerui Liu,
  • Xiaoxiao Yang,
  • Meng Shu,
  • Wen Jin,
  • Yang Tong,
  • Xiaochuan Liu,
  • Yuting Wang,
  • Jiapei Yuan,
  • Yang Yang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01303-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 18

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Biological processes are controlled by groups of genes acting in concert. Investigating gene–gene interactions within different cell types can help researchers understand the regulatory mechanisms behind human complex diseases, such as tumors. Methods We collected extensive single-cell RNA-seq data from tumors, involving 563 patients with 44 different tumor types. Through our analysis, we identified various cell types in tumors and created an atlas of different immune cell subsets across different tumor types. Using the SCINET method, we reconstructed interactome networks specific to different cell types. Diverse functional data was then integrated to gain biological insights into the networks, including somatic mutation patterns and gene functional annotation. Additionally, genes with prognostic relevance within the networks were also identified. We also examined cell–cell communications to investigate how gene interactions modulate cell–cell interactions. Results We developed a data portal called CellNetdb for researchers to study cell-type-specific interactome networks. Our findings indicate that these networks can be used to identify genes with topological specificity in different cell types. We also found that prognostic genes can deconvolved into cell types through analyzing network connectivity. Additionally, we identified commonalities and differences in cell-type-specific networks across different tumor types. Our results suggest that these networks can be used to prioritize risk genes. Conclusions This study presented CellNetdb, a comprehensive repository featuring an atlas of cell-type-specific interactome networks across 44 human tumor types. The findings underscore the utility of these networks in delineating the intricacies of tumor microenvironments and advancing the understanding of molecular mechanisms underpinning human tumors.

Keywords