Nature Communications (Jul 2024)

Electrothermal mineralization of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances for soil remediation

  • Yi Cheng,
  • Bing Deng,
  • Phelecia Scotland,
  • Lucas Eddy,
  • Arman Hassan,
  • Bo Wang,
  • Karla J. Silva,
  • Bowen Li,
  • Kevin M. Wyss,
  • Mine G. Ucak-Astarlioglu,
  • Jinhang Chen,
  • Qiming Liu,
  • Tengda Si,
  • Shichen Xu,
  • Xiaodong Gao,
  • Khalil JeBailey,
  • Debadrita Jana,
  • Mark Albert Torres,
  • Michael S. Wong,
  • Boris I. Yakobson,
  • Christopher Griggs,
  • Matthew A. McCary,
  • Yufeng Zhao,
  • James M. Tour

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49809-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent and bioaccumulative pollutants that can easily accumulate in soil, posing a threat to environment and human health. Current PFAS degradation processes often suffer from low efficiency, high energy and water consumption, or lack of generality. Here, we develop a rapid electrothermal mineralization (REM) process to remediate PFAS-contaminated soil. With environmentally compatible biochar as the conductive additive, the soil temperature increases to >1000 °C within seconds by current pulse input, converting PFAS to calcium fluoride with inherent calcium compounds in soil. This process is applicable for remediating various PFAS contaminants in soil, with high removal efficiencies ( >99%) and mineralization ratios ( >90%). While retaining soil particle size, composition, water infiltration rate, and cation exchange capacity, REM facilitates an increase of exchangeable nutrient supply and arthropod survival in soil, rendering it superior to the time-consuming calcination approach that severely degrades soil properties. REM is scaled up to remediate soil at two kilograms per batch and promising for large-scale, on-site soil remediation. Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis demonstrate REM as an environmentally friendly and economic process, with a significant reduction of energy consumption, greenhouse gas emission, water consumption, and operation cost, when compared to existing soil remediation practices.