Journal of High Energy Physics (Jul 2018)

Magnifying the ATLAS stealth stop splinter: impact of spin correlations and finite widths

  • Timothy Cohen,
  • Walter Hopkins,
  • Stephanie Majewski,
  • Bryan Ostdiek

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)142
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2018, no. 7
pp. 1 – 30

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In this paper, we recast a “stealth stop” search in the notoriously difficult region of the stop-neutralino Simplified Model parameter space for which mt˜1−mχ˜10≃mt $$ m\left({\tilde{t}}_1\right)-m\left({\tilde{\upchi}}_1^0\right)\simeq {m}_t $$. The properties of the final state are nearly identical for tops and stops, while the rate for stop pair production is O $$ \mathcal{O} $$(10%) of that for tt¯ $$ t\overline{t} $$. Stop searches away from this stealth region have left behind a “splinter” of open parameter space when mt˜1≃mt $$ m\left({\tilde{t}}_1\right)\simeq {m}_t $$. Removing this splinter requires surgical precision: the ATLAS constraint on stop pair production reinterpreted here treats the signal as a contaminant to the measurement of the top pair production cross section using data from s=7 $$ \sqrt{s}=7 $$ TeV and 8 TeV in a correlated way to control for some systematic errors. ATLAS fixed mt˜1≃mtandmχ˜10=1 $$ m\left({\tilde{t}}_1\right)\simeq {m}_t\kern0.5em and\kern0.5em m\left({\tilde{\upchi}}_1^0\right)=1 $$ GeV, implying that a careful recasting of these results into the full mt˜1−mχ˜10 $$ m\left({\tilde{t}}_1\right)-m\left({\tilde{\upchi}}_1^0\right) $$ plane is warranted. We find that the parameter space with mχ˜10≲55 $$ m\left({\tilde{\upchi}}_1^0\right)\lesssim 55 $$ GeV is excluded for mt˜1≃mt $$ m\left({\tilde{t}}_1\right)\simeq {m}_t $$ — although this search does cover new parameter space, it is unable to fully pull the splinter. Along the way, we review a variety of interesting physical issues in detail: (i) when the two-body width is a good approximation; (ii) how assuming the narrow width approximation affects the total rate; (iii ) how the production rate is affected when the wrong widths are used; (iv ) what role propagating the spin correlations consistently through the multi-body decay chain plays in the limits. In addition, we provide a guide to using MadGraph for implementing the full production including finite width and spin correlation effects, and we survey a variety of pitfalls one might encounter.

Keywords