Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon (Oct 2022)

Feasibility of Rescue Colonoscopy Using a Short-type Enteroscope (SIF-H290S) without Overtube after Incomplete Colonoscopy: A Single-center Retrospective Pilot Study

  • Yorinari Ochiai,
  • Hiroyuki Odagiri,
  • Junnosuke Hayasaka,
  • Takayuki Okamura,
  • Yugo Suzuki,
  • Yutaka Mitsunaga,
  • Kazuhiro Fuchinoue,
  • Masami Tanaka,
  • Kosuke Nomura,
  • Satoshi Yamashita,
  • Akira Matsui,
  • Daisuke Kikuchi,
  • Shu Hoteya

DOI
https://doi.org/10.23922/jarc.2022-005
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 4
pp. 282 – 288

Abstract

Read online

Objectives: Recently, a newly designed short-type single-balloon enteroscope (SBE), SIF-H290S, has been developed with a smaller outer diameter and a longer working length than conventional colonoscopes. It has passive bending and high-force transmission, making insertion easier. However, it is difficult to perform rescue colonoscopy with an SBE after incomplete colonoscopy in the same session. Therefore, this study evaluated the feasibility of consecutive rescue colonoscopy using SIF-H290S without overtube after incomplete colonoscopy. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study. We included 19 rescue colonoscopies (19 patients) with SIF-H290S without overtube performed by 11 endoscopists in the SIF group and 38 rescue colonoscopies (38 patients) using a small-caliber colonoscope (PCF-PQ260L) were randomly selected for the control group from procedures performed by the same 11 endoscopists. We compared the cecal intubation rate and other outcomes, such as insertion time, between the two groups. Results: The median age of the patients was 72 and 69 years, with 8 and 26 males in the SIF and control groups, respectively. The median body mass index was 21.6 and 22.7 kg/m2 in the SIF and control groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the patient backgrounds between the groups, except for the reason for incomplete colonoscopy (p = 0.048). The cecal intubation rate was 78.9% (15/19 procedures) and 92.1% (35/38 procedures) in the SIF and control groups, respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed the real-world experience and feasibility of rescue colonoscopy using SIF-H290S, which could be a potential rescue device option after incomplete colonoscopy.

Keywords