Clinical Ophthalmology (Apr 2022)

Factors Affecting Compliance with Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Qualitative Study Comparing English and Spanish Speakers

  • Hudson SM,
  • Modjtahedi BS,
  • Altman D,
  • Jimenez JJ,
  • Luong TQ,
  • Fong DS

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 16
pp. 1009 – 1018

Abstract

Read online

Sharon M Hudson,1,2 Bobeck S Modjtahedi,2– 4 Danielle Altman,2 Jennifer J Jimenez,2 Tiffany Q Luong,2 Donald S Fong2,3 1Keck School of Medicine of USC/Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA, USA; 3Eye Monitoring Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Baldwin Park, CA, USA; 4Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USACorrespondence: Bobeck S Modjtahedi, Eye Monitoring Center, Kaiser Permanente Baldwin Park Medical Center, 1011 Baldwin Park Blvd, Baldwin Park, CA, 91706, USA, Email [email protected]: The purpose of this study was to understand individual-, social-, and system-level factors that affect compliance with recommended diabetic retinopathy (DR)-evaluations, and how these factors vary between English and Spanish speakers.Patients and Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Study subjects included Kaiser Permanente Southern California members with type II diabetes mellitus at least aged 26 years who spoke English or Spanish. Patients were divided into groups based on their adherence with DR evaluations. Our main outcome measure was the major themes expressed by patients that explained their compliance with DR evaluation.Results: Fifty-one participants were enrolled: 30 English speakers (11 nonadherent, 19 adherent) and 21 Spanish speakers (8 nonadherent, 13 adherent). Adherent patients were more likely to have had experience with diabetes and identify as being responsible for their own care. Substantially more non-adherent patients suggested that beliefs and attitudes were the reasons people missed retinopathy appointments. More English-speaking participants tended to be self-directed in managing their healthcare, whereas more Spanish speakers relied on others for help. English speakers also noted better relationships with their physicians. Spanish speakers outlined problems with insurance coverage and costs as barriers.Conclusion: These data suggest two specific intervention strategies that eye care providers could implement to improve adherence with diabetic retinopathy screening and follow up: incorporating a person with DR-related visual loss into the team of staff delivering diabetes support programs and communication campaigns including specific messaging to address fears related to vision loss.Keywords: diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, screening, adherence, language

Keywords