Endoscopic gastroesophageal variceal pressure measurement is available in portal hypertension prediction: a pilot study

Abstract

Background: Portal vein pressure (PVP) is crucial in the diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and prognosis of portal hypertension (PHT). At present, the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and the portal vein pressure gradient (PPG) are the main approaches for portal pressure measurement. However, HVPG and PPG are limited in application due to invasive operations and high requirements for medical conditions. A more convenient way to measure portal pressure is demanded. Objectives: To detect whether the endoscopic variceal pressure (EVP) could predict the PVP. Design: This is a single-center retrospective study that detects whether the EVP could predict the PVP. Methods: Thirty-six patients were considered eligible for pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and were willing to accept the endoscopy-TIPS hybrid surgery (continuous operation within 24 h) from April 2023 to October 2023 retrospectively. EVP was measured in the procedure of the modified sandwich method. HVPG, PPG, and PVP were measured following TIPS operation. EVP was compared with HVPG, PPG, and PVP in groups divided by different sarin classifications and whether portal vein thrombosis (PVT) or not. Results: EVP was successfully measured and recorded in all. Totally, HVPG was lower than PPG, PPG was lower than PVP, and EVP manifested between PPG and PVP. In the PVT group, HVPG was lower than PPG, PPG was lower than EVP, and EVP manifested between PPG and PVP. In the non-PVT group, HVPG was lower than PPG, PPG was lower than PVP, and EVP manifested between PPG and PVP. In the gastroesophageal varices group, HVPG was lower than PPG, and PPG was lower than EVP. Conclusion: As a novel way for prediction, EVP measurement might be useful and convenient in PHT. Moreover, it might be closer to the PVP.