Research Involvement and Engagement (Sep 2021)

Are we asking the right questions? Working with the LGBTQ+ community to prioritise healthcare research themes

  • Sally Crowe,
  • Eleanor Barker,
  • Meg Roberts,
  • Lucy Lloyd,
  • Clara M. de Barros,
  • Ben Rebelo-Harris,
  • Catherine Meads,
  • Catherine L. Saunders

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00298-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 13

Abstract

Read online

Plain English Summary Conversations about research priorities with members of the public who identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ+) and are not researchers are not common. We reviewed published research priorities covering LGBTQ+ topics and held an online workshop. The review identified 18 LGBTQ+ research published priority sets. Some focussed on specific populations such as women or men, younger or older people or people living within families. Five were on transgender and gender non- conforming populations. Priorities were achieved by different methods such as workshops and surveys. People involved in setting priorities mostly included researchers, health practitioners and advocacy organisations, two studies involved LGBTQ+ public in their process. Research priorities identified in the review were grouped into themes which were prioritised during the workshop. For the online workshop, participants were recruited using local (Cambridge, UK) LGBTQ+ networks and a national advert and offered payment for their time. Participants personal priorities and experiences contributed to agreeing a final list of seven research themes in priority order. Participants’ experiences of healthcare, mental health advocacy, care homes, caring responsibilities, schools and family units were helpful. From the workshop the three top research themes were: healthcare services delivery, prevention, and particular and multiple challenges of people identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer. Research themes interconnected in many ways as shown by the comments from workshop participants. This paper describes why these priorities were important from participants’ perspective and offers information about how to run an inclusive and respectful public involvement research exercise.

Keywords