Membranes (Aug 2021)

Comparisons of Outcomes between Patients with Direct and Indirect Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

  • Li-Chung Chiu,
  • Li-Pang Chuang,
  • Shih-Wei Lin,
  • Hsin-Hsien Li,
  • Shaw-Woei Leu,
  • Ko-Wei Chang,
  • Chi-Hsien Huang,
  • Tzu-Hsuan Chiu,
  • Huang-Pin Wu,
  • Feng-Chun Tsai,
  • Chung-Chi Huang,
  • Han-Chung Hu,
  • Kuo-Chin Kao

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080644
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 8
p. 644

Abstract

Read online

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a heterogeneous syndrome caused by direct (local damage to lung parenchyma) or indirect lung injury (insults from extrapulmonary sites with acute systemic inflammatory response), the clinical and biological complexity can have a profound effect on clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 152 severe ARDS patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Our objective was to assess the differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes of direct and indirect ARDS patients receiving ECMO. Overall hospital mortality was 53.3%. A total of 118 patients were assigned to the direct ARDS group, and 34 patients were assigned to the indirect ARDS group. The 28-, 60-, and 90-day hospital mortality rates were significantly higher among indirect ARDS patients (all p < 0.05). Cox regression models demonstrated that among direct ARDS patients, diabetes mellitus, immunocompromised status, ARDS duration before ECMO, and SOFA score during the first 3 days of ECMO were independently associated with mortality. In indirect ARDS patients, SOFA score and dynamic compliance during the first 3 days of ECMO were independently associated with mortality. Our findings revealed that among patients receiving ECMO, direct and indirect subphenotypes of ARDS have distinct clinical outcomes and different predictors for mortality.

Keywords