Topical prebiotic nitrate: optimizing the ‘hang-time’, source and dose for specific oral or systemic effects

Abstract

Abstract In our opinion, the ‘hang-time’ of nitrate-containing products discussed in the letter by Green and Green is an interesting variable that should be considered when nitrate-based treatment or prevention strategies are designed. However, due to direct nitrate recycling after nitrate intake, products with a long ‘hang-time’ (e.g., chewing gum) may not always have an advantage compared to products with a short ‘hang-time’ (e.g., vegetable juices). We argue that extending the ‘hang-time’ is especially relevant and potentially beneficial for different applications, such as using a low nitrate dose to stimulate the oral effects, reaching oral tissues that may otherwise not be exposed to dietary nitrate (e.g., periodontal pockets), and providing a longer nitrate exposure in individuals with an impaired salivary flow. Apart from the ‘hang-time’, other important variables are the nitrate dose and source (e.g., different salts and vegetable extracts), as well as the desired effect (e.g., an oral effect versus systemic effects). Finally, we believe that the alterations in salivary microbiota observed before and after chewing three nitrate-rich gums over a period of ~5 h, as reported by Green and Green, could be considered beneficial. However, the oral microbiota composition is affected by the circadian rhythm and the effect of gum mastication should be evaluated. These results should thus be confirmed by a placebo-controlled study, where these confounding factors can be accounted for.