Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control (Sep 2023)

Mapping of infection prevention and control education and training in some countries of the World Health Organization’s Eastern Mediterranean Region: current situation and future needs

  • Rima Moghnieh,
  • Amal Saif Al-Maani,
  • Jana Berro,
  • Nour Ibrahim,
  • Rana Attieh,
  • Dania Abdallah,
  • Jameela Al-Ajmi,
  • Dhouha Hamdani,
  • Najiba Abdulrazzaq,
  • Abeer Omar,
  • Safa Al-Khawaja,
  • Rami Al-Abadla,
  • Salam Al-Ratrout,
  • Mohammad Gharaibeh,
  • Zakaria Abdelrahim,
  • Hiba Azrag,
  • Karima Mayar Amiri,
  • Atika Berry,
  • Bashar Hagali,
  • Jamal Kadhim,
  • Huda Al-Shami,
  • Mumtaz Ali Khan,
  • Roula Husni,
  • Iman Heweidy,
  • Bassim Zayed

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01299-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background A strong understanding of infection prevention and control (IPC) procedures and comprehensive training among healthcare workers is essential for effective IPC programs. These elements play a crucial role in breaking the chain of nosocomial infections by preventing the transmission of resistant organisms to patients and staff members. This study mapped the components of IPC education and training across various member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) at national, academic, and healthcare institutional levels. Methods A self-administered structured online questionnaire based on the WHO “Core Component 3” of IPC programs at the national and acute healthcare facility levels (IPC education and training) was given to national IPC focal persons in each of the WHO’s EMR countries between February and March 2023. Results From 14 of the 22 countries,15 IPC persons participated in the survey. Most countries have scattered nonhomogeneous IPC education programs in human health undergraduate majors without considering it a standalone module. Academic institutions are rarely involved, and elaborate and predefined undergraduate IPC education programs provided by universities are present in 21.4% of the countries. In 71.4% of these countries, postgraduate training targeting IPC professionals is provided by national IPC teams, primarily based on national IPC guidelines developed with the aid of the WHO. Generally, healthcare worker training relies heavily on healthcare facilities in 92.9% of the countries, rather than on a national training program. In 42.9% of the countries, practicing IPC physicians are not necessarily specialists of infectious disease or medical microbiologists and IPC nurses are not required to specialize in IPC. However, nonspecialized IPC professionals are expected to undergo training upon employment and before beginning practice. Nongovernmental organizations such as the WHO play a significant role in IPC education and in supporting national IPC authorities in establishing national IPC guidelines, as it is the case in 78.6% of these countries. Conclusion Clear disparities exist in IPC education and training across different countries in the WHO’s EMR. Establishing a regional scientific network specializing in IPC would help bridge the existing gaps and standardize this education within individual countries and across countries in the region. This region needs to establish IPC certification standards and standardized education curricula.

Keywords