Frontiers in Digital Health (Apr 2024)

Accuracy, concurrent validity, and test–retest reliability of pressure-based insoles for gait measurement in chronic stroke patients

  • Saskia Neumann,
  • Saskia Neumann,
  • Christoph M. Bauer,
  • Luca Nastasi,
  • Luca Nastasi,
  • Julia Läderach,
  • Eva Thürlimann,
  • Anne Schwarz,
  • Jeremia P. O. Held,
  • Chris A. Easthope,
  • Chris A. Easthope

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1359771
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionWearables are potentially valuable tools for understanding mobility behavior in individuals with neurological disorders and how it changes depending on health status, such as after rehabilitation. However, the accurate detection of gait events, which are crucial for the evaluation of gait performance and quality, is challenging due to highly individual-specific patterns that also vary greatly in movement and speed, especially after stroke. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy, concurrent validity, and test–retest reliability of a commercially available insole system in the detection of gait events and the calculation of stance duration in individuals with chronic stroke.MethodsPressure insole data were collected from 17 individuals with chronic stroke during two measurement blocks, each comprising three 10-min walking tests conducted in a clinical setting. The gait assessments were recorded with a video camera that served as a ground truth, and pressure insoles as an experimental system. We compared the number of gait events and stance durations between systems.Results and discussionOver all 3,820 gait events, 90.86% were correctly identified by the insole system. Recall values ranged from 0.994 to 1, with a precision of 1 for all measurements. The F1 score ranged from 0.997 to 1. Excellent absolute agreement (Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.874) was observed for the calculation of the stance duration, with a slightly longer stance duration recorded by the insole system (difference of −0.01 s). Bland–Altmann analysis indicated limits of agreement of 0.33 s that were robust to changes in walking speed. This consistency makes the system well-suited for individuals post-stroke. The test–retest reliability between measurement timepoints T1 and T2 was excellent (ICC = 0.928). The mean difference in stance duration between T1 and T2 was 0.03 s. We conclude that the insole system is valid for use in a clinical setting to quantitatively assess continuous walking in individuals with stroke.

Keywords