Agronomy (Feb 2023)

Wheat Yield Gap Assessment in Using the Comparative Performance Analysis (CPA)

  • Kambiz Mootab Laleh,
  • Majid Ghorbani Javid,
  • Iraj Alahdadi,
  • Elias Soltani,
  • Saeid Soufizadeh,
  • José Luis González-Andújar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030705
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 3
p. 705

Abstract

Read online

One of the crucial issues in developing nations is diminishing the yield gaps. Therefore, accurate yield gap estimation has many real-world uses for increasing crop production. Utilizing comparative performance analysis (CPA) techniques, the yield gap of wheat fields was evaluated in this study. In Varamin, Tehran Province, Iran, data on 104 wheat fields were collected between 2018 and 2020 and every aspect of wheat field management has been documented. The CPA model determines the yield gap’s contributing factors and potential yield. The results of data analysis revealed that the production ranged from 2600 to 7600 kg ha−1. The CPA method predicted a potential yield of 9316 kg ha−1 and found a yield gap of 3748 kg ha−1; this amount was 40.23% of the potential yield. Leaf chlorophyll (29%), irrigation at stem extension (9%), LAI (7.7%), soil salinity (8.2%), field area (16.3%), phosphorus consumption (6%), nitrogen utilized at the stage of tillering (16%), and HI (7.8%) all contributed to the yield gap in the CPA. It has been said that the computed yield in CPA is a potential yield that can be reached. CPA is a cheap and straightforward tool that could identify yield gaps and their causes in a district without the need for costly experiments. Therefore, developing nations with significant efficiency and yield gaps can use these techniques effectively.

Keywords