Outcomes of patients with active cancer after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an updated meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with active cancer and aortic stenosis may be under-referred for valve interventions due to concerns over a prohibitive risk. However, whether active cancer impacts outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unknown. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library in December 2023 for studies comparing the post-TAVR outcomes of patients with versus without active cancer. We pooled odds ratios (OR) and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) applying a random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.3.2. Results We included nine observational studies analyzing 133,906 patients, of whom 9,792 (7.3%) had active cancer. Compared with patients without cancer, patients with active cancer had higher short- (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.15–1.55; p < 0.001) and long-term mortality (OR 2.29; 95% CI 1.80–2.91; p < 0.001) rates, not driven by cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.70–2.40; p = 0.40), and higher major bleeding rates (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.15–2.42; p = 0.008). The higher mortality rate was sustained in an adjusted analysis (aHR 1.77; 95% CI 1.34–2.35; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cardiac, renal, and cerebral complications at a follow-up ranging from 180 days to 10 years. Conclusion Patients with active cancer undergoing TAVR had higher non-cardiovascular mortality and bleeding rates, with comparable incidences of other complications. This highlights the need for a shared decision and appropriate patient selection considering cancer type, staging, bleeding risk, and optimal timing for intervention. Graphical Abstract

Keywords

• Aortic valve stenosis
• Cardio-oncology
• Meta-analysis
• Neoplasms
• Transcatheter aortic valve replacement