Cancers (Nov 2022)

Histology Classification Highlights Differences in Efficacy of S-1 versus Capecitabine, in Combination with Cisplatin, for HER2-Negative Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer with Measurable Disease

  • Hisato Kawakami,
  • Kazuhiro Nishikawa,
  • Toshio Shimokawa,
  • Kazumasa Fujitani,
  • Shigeyuki Tamura,
  • Shunji Endo,
  • Michiya Kobayashi,
  • Junji Kawada,
  • Yukinori Kurokawa,
  • Akira Tsuburaya,
  • Takaki Yoshikawa,
  • Junichi Sakamoto,
  • Taroh Satoh,
  • on behalf of the HERBIS-2, HERBIS-4A and XParTS II Study Investigators

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225673
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 22
p. 5673

Abstract

Read online

It has been suggested that the therapeutic efficacy of S-1 + cisplatin (SP) and capecitabine + cisplatin (XP) may differ depending on the histology of the tumor, but no clear evidence exists. Individual participant data were obtained from three randomized phase II trials in which such patients received either SP (S-1 [40–60 mg twice daily for 21 days] plus cisplatin [60 mg/m2 on day 8], every 5 weeks) or XP (capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days] plus cisplatin [80 mg/m2 on day 1], every 3 weeks). A total of 162 patients were included, with 79 patients in the SP arm and 83 patients in the XP arm. Although there was also no difference between arms in ORR according to histological classification, differentiated tumors showed a significantly better OS (but not PFS) for SP versus XP that was associated with a deeper tumor shrinkage. Undifferentiated tumors showed a consistently better OS, and PFS for SP versus XP, likely because cases without tumor shrinkage tended to be fewer for SP. Our data thus showed that SP was superior to XP in this setting, but there were qualitative differences in therapeutic efficacy dependent on tumor histology.

Keywords