Thoracic Cancer (Nov 2020)

Predictive value of 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for PD‐L1 expression in non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

  • Hee Yun Seol,
  • Yun Seong Kim,
  • Seong‐Jang Kim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13664
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 11
pp. 3260 – 3268

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The purpose of the current study was to investigate the predictive value of 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F‐FDG PET/CT) for programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients through a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Methods The PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE database, from the earliest available date of indexing through 30 April 2020, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of 18F‐FDG PET/CT for prediction of PD‐L1 expression in NSCLC patients. Results Across six studies (1739 patients), the pooled sensitivity for 18F‐FDG PET/CT was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.58–0.82) with heterogeneity (I2 = 90.9, P < 0.001) and a pooled specificity of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64–0.74) with heterogeneity (I2 = 77.9, P < 0.001). Likelihood ratio (LR) syntheses gave an overall positive likelihood ratio (LR +) of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) and negative likelihood ratio (LR‐) of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.26–0.63). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was six (95% CI: 3–11). Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that the area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70–0.78). Conclusions The current meta‐analysis showed a moderate sensitivity and specificity of 18F‐FDG PET/CT for the prediction of PD‐L1 expression in NSCLC patients. The DOR was low and the likelihood ratio scatter‐gram indicated that 18F‐FDG PET/CT might not be useful for the prediction of PD‐L1 expression in NSCLC patients and not for its exclusion. Key points Significant findings of the study The current meta‐analysis showed a moderate sensitivity and specificity of 18F‐FDG PET/CT for the prediction of PD‐L1 expression in NSCLC patients. The DOR was low and the likelihood ratio scattergram indicated that 18F‐FDG PET/CT might not be useful for the prediction of PD‐L1 expression in NSCLC patients and not for its exclusion. What this study adds This study concluded that the role of 18F‐FDG PET/CT in predicting tumor expression of PD‐L1 should be further elucidated.

Keywords