Distrattori e chiavi in un cloze lessicale a scelta multipla di livello avanzato: l’opportunità di considerare il giudizio di nativi esperti

Abstract

For the purpose of this study, we had two different groups of native experts (n=37) sit 2 multiple choice reading cloze tests intended for C2 level students taken from the CILS certification in Italian as a foreign language (Università per Stranieri, Siena). We then analyzed the answers not coinciding with those intended by the certifying body. The analysis demonstrates the presence of certain plausible distractors. We discuss certain conclusions regarding the certifier’s need to take the judgment of native experts into account as a means of validating the test

Keywords

• test
• validità
• cloze
• lessico