Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology (Apr 2023)

The value of 3D quantitative scoring of endolymphatic hydrops in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Ménière's disease

  • Heng Xiao,
  • Jianwei Lin,
  • Chenxin Lin,
  • Xiaojing Guo,
  • Huimin Cai,
  • Xing Lin,
  • Shengnan Ye

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1047
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 2
pp. 568 – 576

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Objective We aimed to explore the application of three‐dimensional (3D) quantitative scoring of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) based on gadolinium‐contrast MRI in both the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Ménière's disease (MD). Methods Local threshold method based on signal intensities was used to quantitatively measure volumes, and the degree of EH was scored by 3D quantitative scoring. The receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of this method against conventional evaluation methods. The scores of MD, sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), delayed endolymphatic hydrops (DEH), and vestibular migraine (VM) group were compared and correlated with clinical examination results, including pure tone audiometry (PTA), electrocochleogram, and caloric test. Results The sensitivity and specificity of 3D quantitative scoring were 94.1% and 92.2%, while conventional evaluation methods were 84.3% and 88.2%, respectively. Cochlear score (CR), vestibular score (VR), semicircular canal score (SR), and total scores (TR) in MD group were significantly higher than those in SSNHL group. The rate of diagnosis of MD was significantly higher in the MD group (92.2%) than VM group (27.3%). In MD, PTA was significantly correlated with CR and SR, the ratio of summating potential to action potential (‐SP/AP) of electrocochleogram was significantly correlated with CR, VR, and SR, also canal paresis (CP) value of caloric test was significantly correlated with SR. Conclusion 3D quantitative scoring demonstrated better diagnostic efficacy than conventional evaluation methods for Ménière's disease, and it may be an effective clinical tool to distinguish MD from SSNHL and VM. The clinical practicality of inner ear‐enhanced MRI was further confirmed. Level of Evidence IV.

Keywords