Comparison between cryoballoon double stop and single stop in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Abstract

Background: Currently, cryoballoon (CB) thawing after single stop is generally performed. Previous research had reported that long thawing time using a single stop affects pulmonary veins tissue injury. However, it is uncertain whether CB thawing after single stop affects clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to clarify clinical significance of CB thawing in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods: Two hundred ten patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who underwent CB from January 2018 to October 2019 were analyzed. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients whose CB applications were completely stopped with only the double stop technique (DS group, n = 99) and patients with single stop (SS group, n = 111). In DS group, we performed double stop technique for all CB application regardless of phrenic nerve injury or the temperature of esophagus. Results: The atrial arrhythmia free-survival rate at 2 years after CB was significantly lower for the DS group than the SS group (76.8% vs 87.4%; p = 0.045). Complications occurred in 2 patients from the DS group and no complications were observed in patients from the SS group (p = 0.13). Mean procedural time was shorter in the DS group than in the SS group (53.1 vs 58.1 min; p = 0.046) Conclusion: DS group had higher recurrence rate than SS group. There was no significant difference regarding safety between both the groups. We found that the thawing process after single stop is very important for CB application.

Keywords

• Cryoballoon ablation
• Atrial fibrillation
• Double stop
• Catheter ablation