Clinical Ophthalmology (Mar 2025)

Evaluation of Sum of Segments Biometry in Modern Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Long Eyes

  • Helaly HA,
  • Gaballah KA,
  • Ragab AM,
  • Ibrahim TM

Journal volume & issue
Vol. Volume 19
pp. 785 – 793

Abstract

Read online

Hany Ahmed Helaly,1 Karim Abdellatif Gaballah,2 Ahmed Mahmoud Ragab,1 Tamer Moussa Ibrahim1 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, EgyptCorrespondence: : Hany Ahmed Helaly, Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, 30 Roshdy Street, Roshdy, Alexandria, Egypt, Tel +201225466733, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the sum of segments (SOS) biometry in modern intraocular lens power (IOL) calculation formulas for long eyes.Methods: This was a retrospective case series that included 177 eyes from 177 patients with axial length (AL) ≥ 24.5 mm. Preoperative AL measurements were performed using the ARGOS (Alcon, Inc). This study used 2 formulas: the Barrett Universal II (BUII) and the Barrett true axial length (BTAL). Other formulas were included: Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, and PEARL DGS.Results: The Barrett Universal II formula exhibited the most significant myopic mean prediction error at − 0.15 ± 0.27 D, with the Cooke K6, PEARL-DGS, and EVO 2.0 formulas following. In terms of hyperopic mean prediction error, the PEARL-DGSsos formula recorded the highest value at 0.19 ± 0.32 D, succeeded by the EVO 2.0sos, Cooke K6sos, and BTAL formulas. The EVO 2.0, PEARL-DGS, Barrett Universal II, and Cooke K6 formulas demonstrated the lowest mean and median absolute errors, with BTAL, EVO 2.0sos, Cooke K6sos, and PEARL-DGSsos formulas trailing behind. The median absolute errors (MedAE) for EVO 2.0, PEARL-DGS, and Barrett Universal II were recorded at 0.13, 0.15, and 0.16 D, respectively.Conclusion: BUII formula showed myopic shift with SOS biometry which increases with longer eyes. Using SOS option in Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, and PEARL-DGS formulas leads to a hyperopic shift in the mean prediction error which is undesirable. Using ALsos in those formulas without choosing the option of SOS yields a mean prediction error towards the myopic side which might be more desirable. All included formulas performed well with ALsos with most of the cases within + 1 D of intended refraction.Keywords: biometry, sum of segments, ARGOS, long eyes, IOL power calculation

Keywords