Juxta: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga (Jan 2024)

Risk Factor Profile of Amputation in Diabetic Foot Patients in Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, from 2019 to 2020

  • Aria Damarjiwo Adhibagio,
  • Soebagijo Adi Soelistijo,
  • Arief Rakhman Hakim,
  • Agung Prasmono

DOI
https://doi.org/10.20473/juxta.V15I12024.8-16
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 1
pp. 8 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: This study aimed to find the general distribution of certain variables as risk factors for lower extremity amputation among diabetic foot patients at the Inpatient Ward of the Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, from 2019 to 2020. Methods: This was a descriptive-retrospective study using data from medical records. The International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 was used to calculate the distribution. Results: The mean ± SD of age was 55.38 ± 7.503 years old and was slightly female-biased. The median (min-max) blood sugar level was 212.00 (85–446) mg/dL. Fifteen out of 16 patients had an HbA1c beyond 7.0%. The body mass index (BMI) of most patients was between normal and overweight, with a mean ± SD of 24.018 ± 4.1827. Fifteen percent of patients were smokers. Strokes were present in 3.9% of patients, cardiovascular diseases were present in 13.73% of patients, prior lower extremity amputation (LEA) history was present in 15.7% of patients, hypertension was present in 49% of patients, and dyslipidemia was present in 13 of 15 patients. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 70.15 ± 34.498 mL/min/1.732. Conclusion: Older age, high blood sugar, high HbA1c levels, nephropathy, dyslipidemia, and hypertension had a high prevalence. Smoking, cardiovascular diseases, strokes, and prior amputation had a low prevalence. Gram-negative bacterial infection was observed in almost all reported patients. ABI results were either mostly not assessable or abnormally high. Most of the patients’ Wagner gradings were in the worst category.

Keywords