Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock (Jan 2019)

Subarachnoid versus nonsubarachnoid traumatic brain injuries: The impact of decision-making on patient safety

  • Brandon Diaz,
  • Adel Elkbuli,
  • Rachel Wobig,
  • Kelly McKenney,
  • Daniella Jaguan,
  • Dessy Boneva,
  • Shaikh Hai,
  • Mark McKenney

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/JETS.JETS_123_18
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 3
pp. 173 – 175

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Traumatic intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) are high priority injuries. Traumatic brain bleeds can be categorized as traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) versus non-SAH-ICH. Non-SAH-ICH includes subdural, epidural, and intraventricular hematomas and brain contusions. We hypothesize that awake patients with SAH will have lower mortality and needless interventions than awake patients with non-SAH-ICHs. Study Design and Methods: A review of data collected from our Level I trauma center was conducted. Awake was defined as an initial Glasgow coma score (GCS) 13–15. Patients were divided into two cohorts: awake SAH and awake non-SAH-ICH. Chi-square and t-test analyses were used with statistical significance defined as P 0.05). Mortality rates were, however, significantly lower in SAH patients compared to the non-SAH-ICH (4/225 [1.78%] vs. 22/826 [2.66%], P < 0.05). The need for neurosurgical intervention was significantly different comparing the SAH group versus non-SAH-ICH (2/225 [0.89%] vs. 100/826 [12.1%], P < 0.05). Conclusion: Despite similar predicted mortality rates, awake patients with a SAH are associated with a significantly lower risk of death and need for neurosurgical intervention when compared to other types of awake patients with a traumatic brain bleed.

Keywords