Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences (May 2023)

Deontic technology perceptions: a complementary view to instrumental perspectives on technology acceptance and use

  • Matthew B. Perrigino,
  • Benjamin B. Dunford,
  • R. Wayne Boss,
  • Matt Troup,
  • David S. Boss

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-08-2022-0103
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 2
pp. 103 – 119

Abstract

Read online

Purpose – For decades, organizational research has primarily considered instrumental technology perceptions (ITP) – emphasizing how technology impacts the personal interests of end users themselves – to understand technology acceptance. The authors offer a complementary paradigm by introducing deontic technology perceptions (DTP), defined as the degree to which individuals believe that the technology they use is beneficial to other individuals beyond themselves (e.g. beneficial to customers). Design/methodology/approach – The authors collected quantitative survey-based data from three different hospitals located in the United States. On the basis of conservation of resources theory, the authors investigated whether both DTP and ITP were associated with improved work-related well-being. Findings – Two pilot studies (n = 161 and n = 311 nurses) substantiated our DTP conceptualization. Our primary study (n = 346 nurses) found support for the association between DTP and improved work-related well-being. Evidence for the relationship between ITP and work-related well-being was mixed and the authors did not find a statistically significant interaction between DTP and ITP. Originality/value – The authors build on decades of research on technology acceptance by complementing it with our deontic perspective. Our work demonstrates that technology users pay attention and react meaningfully to how their use of technology impacts not only themselves but also external parties like patients, customers and members of the general public.

Keywords