SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; and Department of Neuroscience, Health Sciences Institute, Ege University, Turkey
Ozgul Uslu
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; and Department of Neuroscience, Health Sciences Institute, Ege University, Turkey
Burcu Ozkul
School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Australia
Kaya Oguz
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; and Department of Computer Engineering, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
Seda Eroglu-Koc
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; and Department of Psychology, Faculty of Letters, Dokuz Eylul University, Turkey
Gozde Kizilates-Evin
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; Neuroimaging Unit, Hulusi Behcet Life Sciences Research Laboratory, Istanbul University, Turkey; and Department of Neuroscience, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul University, Turkey
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; and International Computer Institute, Ege University, Turkey
Yigit Erdogan
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; and Department of Neuroscience, Health Sciences Institute, Ege University, Turkey
Defne Dakota Mull
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; and Department of Neuroscience, Health Sciences Institute, Ege University, Turkey
Omer Kitis
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey; and Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey
Ali Saffet Gonul
SoCAT Lab, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Ege University, Turkey
Background Having social support improves one's health outcomes and self-esteem, and buffers the negative impact of stressors. Previous studies have explored the association between social support and brain activity, but evidence from task-dependent functional connectivity is still limited. Aims We aimed to explore how gradually decreasing levels of social support influence task-dependent functional connectivity across several major neural networks. Method We designed a social support task and recruited 72 young adults from real-life social groups. Of the four members in each group, one healthy participant (18 participants in total) completed the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan. The fMRI task included three phases with varying levels of social support: high-support phase, fair phase and low-support phase. Functional connectivity changes according to three phases were examined by generalised psychophysiological interaction analysis. Results The results of the analysis demonstrated that participants losing expected support showed increased connectivity among salience network, default mood network and frontoparietal network nodes during the fair phase compared with the high-support phase. During the low-support phase, participants showed increased connectivity among only salience network nodes compared with the high-support phase. Conclusions The results indicate that the loss of support was perceived as a threat signal and induced widespread increased functional connectivity within brain networks. The observation of significant functional connectivity changes between fair and high-support phases suggests that even a small loss of social support from close ones leads to major changes in brain function.