PLoS ONE (Jan 2016)

Evaluation of Focal Liver Reaction after Proton Beam Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Examined Using Gd-EOB-DTPA Enhanced Hepatic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

  • Shigeyuki Takamatsu,
  • Kazutaka Yamamoto,
  • Yoshikazu Maeda,
  • Mariko Kawamura,
  • Satoshi Shibata,
  • Yoshitaka Sato,
  • Kazuki Terashima,
  • Yasuhiro Shimizu,
  • Yuji Tameshige,
  • Makoto Sasaki,
  • Satoko Asahi,
  • Tamaki Kondou,
  • Satoshi Kobayashi,
  • Osamu Matsui,
  • Toshifumi Gabata

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167155
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 12
p. e0167155

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundProton beam therapy (PBT) achieves good local control for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and toxicity tends to be lower than for photon radiotherapy. Focal liver parenchymal damage in radiotherapy is described as the focal liver reaction (FLR); the threshold doses (TDs) for FLR in the background liver have been analyzed in stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy and brachytherapy. To develop a safer approach for PBT, both TD and liver volume changes are considered clinically important in predicting the extent of damage before treatment, and subsequently in reducing background liver damage. We investigated appearance time, TDs and volume changes regarding FLR after PBT for HCC.Material and methodsPatients who were treated using PBT and were followed up using gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI) after PBT were enrolled. Sixty-eight lesions in 58 patients were eligible for analysis. MRI was acquired at the end of treatment, and at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after PBT. We defined the FLR as a clearly depicted hypointense area on the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI, and we monitored TDs and volume changes in the FLR area and the residual liver outside of the FLR area.ResultsFLR was depicted in all lesions at 3 months after PBT. In FLR expressed as the 2-Gy equivalent dose (α/β = 3 Gy), TDs did not differ significantly (27.0±6.4 CGE [10 fractions [Fr] vs. 30.5±7.3 CGE [20 Fr]). There were also no correlations between the TDs and clinical factors, and no significant differences between Child-Pugh A and B scores. The volume of the FLR area decreased and the residual liver volume increased, particularly during the initial 3 months.ConclusionThis study established the FLR dose for liver with HCC, which might be useful in the prediction of remnant liver volume for PBT.