Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open (May 2024)

Shared Decision-making in Breast Cancer Reconstructive Surgery: Experience in a Leading Hospital

  • María Herrera de la Muela, MD, PhD,
  • Santiago Sanz Medrano, MD,
  • Francisco Leyva, MD, PhD,
  • Inmaculada Masa Jurado, MD, PhD,
  • Ana I. Membrilla Ortiz, NP,
  • Juana Brenes Sánchez, MD, PhD,
  • Miriam de la Puente Yagüe, MD, PhD,
  • Jorge Ruiz Rodríguez, MD, PhD,
  • Javier Buendía Pérez, MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005846
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 5
p. e5846

Abstract

Read online

Background:. The paradigm of healthcare has evolved toward patient-centered approaches, where shared decision-making (SDM) plays a pivotal role. This study aimed to explore the implementation of SDM during breast cancer reconstruction consultations and assess its impact on patient satisfaction and the decision-making process as a whole. Methods:. A total of 102 female patients undergoing breast reconstruction were included in a multidisciplinary breast pathology unit. A streamlined SDM model involving choice introduction, option description, and preference exploration was implemented. A validated Spanish version of the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire was used alongside a complementary questionnaire. Data analysis was carried out using electronic data capture software. Results:. The nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire results indicate strong agreement in presenting various options and explaining their advantages and disadvantages. Patients were less confident about their participation in decision-making. The Complementary Shared Decision Making Questionnaire highlighted high satisfaction with interview times and language clarity but areas for improvement in consultation space and therapeutic choice participation. Conclusions:. Integrating SDM into breast reconstruction consultations empowers patients in the decision-making process and enhances satisfaction. Decision aids prove effective in this context, facilitating patients’ comprehension and reducing decisional conflict. There are areas for improvement within the SDM strategy, and they are detectable through scales. Although challenges in information transmission and patient involvement persist, adopting an SDM model has potential benefits that warrant further investigation.