Journal of Arrhythmia (Jun 2013)

Current status of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillators and factors influencing its prognosis in Japan

  • Akihiko Shimizu,
  • Takeshi Mihashi,
  • Hiroshi Furushima,
  • Yukio Sekiguchi,
  • Tetsuyuki Manaka,
  • Nobuhiro Nishii,
  • Takeshi Ueyama,
  • Hisashi Yokoshiki,
  • Norishige Morita,
  • Takashi Nitta,
  • Ken Okumura

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2013.04.006
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 3
pp. 168 – 174

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the prognosis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillators (CRT-Ds) in Japan. Methods: We selected 384 patients implanted with a CRT-D device from the observation database (n=1482) of the Japanese Cardiac Device Therapy Registry. We investigated the CRT criteria, including the presence of New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and QRS duration ≥120 ms. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the group fulfilling all of the 3 criteria (Group A, n=229) and the group not fulfilling the criteria (Group B, n=155). We compared mortality and appropriate shock rates between the 2 groups. Results: There was no significant difference in mortality (17.9% vs. 13.5%) or appropriate shock rates (32.5% vs. 31.6%) during the observation period of 29.0±15.7 months between the 2 groups. A logistic multivariate analysis showed that appropriate shocks (hazard ratio [HR]=1.85) and class III antiarrhythmic agents (HR=2.33) were independently associated with all-cause death, and that age ≥70 years (HR=0.55), male gender (HR=2.07), and presence of a single-chamber device (HR=1.78) were associated with appropriate shocks. The prognosis of Group A was better than that of the COMPANION trial. Conclusions: Japanese patients with CRT-D devices had a better prognosis than did those in the COMPANION trial, but no significant differences were observed between patients fulfilling and those not fulfilling the above mentioned criteria.

Keywords