Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy (Aug 2024)

Performance of plasma p-tau217 for the detection of amyloid-β positivity in a memory clinic cohort using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay

  • Adam H. Dyer,
  • Helena Dolphin,
  • Antoinette O’Connor,
  • Laura Morrison,
  • Gavin Sedgwick,
  • Conor Young,
  • Emily Killeen,
  • Conal Gallagher,
  • Aoife McFeely,
  • Eimear Connolly,
  • Naomi Davey,
  • Paul Claffey,
  • Paddy Doyle,
  • Shane Lyons,
  • Christine Gaffney,
  • Ruth Ennis,
  • Cathy McHale,
  • Jasmine Joseph,
  • Graham Knight,
  • Emmet Kelly,
  • Cliona O’Farrelly,
  • Aoife Fallon,
  • Sean O’Dowd,
  • Nollaig M. Bourke,
  • Sean P. Kennelly

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01555-z
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Plasma p-tau217 has emerged as the most promising blood-based marker (BBM) for the detection of Alzheimer Disease (AD) pathology, yet few studies have evaluated plasma p-tau217 performance in memory clinic settings. We examined the performance of plasma p-tau217 for the detection of AD using a high-sensitivity immunoassay in individuals undergoing diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP). Methods Paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were analysed from the TIMC-BRAiN cohort. Amyloid (Aβ) and Tau (T) pathology were classified based on established cut-offs for CSF Aβ42 and CSF p-tau181 respectively. High-sensitivity electrochemiluminescence (ECL) immunoassays were performed on paired plasma/CSF samples for p-tau217, p-tau181, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP), Neurofilament Light (NfL) and total tau (t-tau). Biomarker performance was evaluated using Receiver-Operating Curve (ROC) and Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) analysis. Results Of 108 participants (age: 69 ± 6.5 years; 54.6% female) with paired samples obtained at time of LP, 64.8% (n = 70/108) had Aβ pathology detected (35 with Mild Cognitive Impairment and 35 with mild dementia). Plasma p-tau217 was over three-fold higher in Aβ + (12.4 pg/mL; 7.3—19.2 pg/mL) vs. Aβ- participants (3.7 pg/mL; 2.8—4.1 pg/mL; Mann–Whitney U = 230, p < 0.001). Plasma p-tau217 exhibited excellent performance for the detection of Aβ pathology (AUC: 0.91; 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 0.86–0.97)—greater than for T pathology (AUC: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.75–0.90; z = 1.75, p = 0.04). Plasma p-tau217 outperformed plasma p-tau181 for the detection of Aβ pathology (z = 3.24, p < 0.001). Of the other BBMs, only plasma GFAP significantly differed by Aβ status which significantly correlated with plasma p-tau217 in Aβ + (but not in Aβ-) individuals. Application of a two-point threshold at 95% and 97.5% sensitivities & specificities may have enabled avoidance of LP in 58–68% of cases. Conclusions Plasma p-tau217 measured using a high-sensitivity ECL immunoassay demonstrated excellent performance for detection of Aβ pathology in a real-world memory clinic cohort. Moving forward, clinical use of plasma p-tau217 to detect AD pathology may substantially reduce need for confirmatory diagnostic testing for AD pathology with diagnostic LP in specialist memory services.

Keywords