Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (Jun 2024)

Bedaquiline susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium abscessus complex and Mycobacterium avium complex: A meta-analysis study

  • Ming Wang,
  • Peixuan Men,
  • Weihe Zhang,
  • Jing Wu,
  • Yuzhen Gu,
  • Fen Wang,
  • Hairong Huang,
  • Xia Yu,
  • Hongfei Duan

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 37
pp. 135 – 140

Abstract

Read online

Objective: This study aims to estimate the overall in vitro activity of bedaquiline (BDQ) against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABS) and M. avium complex (MAC), considering BDQ as a repurposed drug for non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of publications in PubMed/ MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase up to 15 April 2023. Studies were included if they followed the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for drug susceptibility testing (DST). Using a random effects model, we assessed the overall in vitro BDQ resistance rate in clinical isolates of MABS and MAC. Sources of heterogeneity were analysed using Cochran's Q and the I2 statistic. All analyses were performed using CMA V3.0. Results: A total of 24 publications (19 reports for MABS and 11 for MAC) were included. Using 1 µg/mL and 2 µg/mL as the breakpoint for BDQ resistance, the pooled rates of in vitro BDQ resistance in clinical isolates of MABS were found to be 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7–4.6%) and 1.7% (95% CI, 0.6–4.4%), respectively. In the case of MAC, the pooled rates were 1.7% (95% CI, 0.4–6.9%) and 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4–6.8%) for 1 µg/mL and 2 µg/mL, respectively. Conclusion: This study reports the prevalence of BDQ resistance in clinical isolates of MABS and MAC. The findings suggest that BDQ holds potential as a repurposed drug for treating MABS and MAC infections.

Keywords