Journal of Clinical Medicine (Feb 2024)

Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes between Early and Late Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Observational Study

  • Majd Al Deen Alhuarrat,
  • Kirolos Barssoum,
  • Medhat Chowdhury,
  • Sheetal Vasundara Mathai,
  • Miriam Helft,
  • Michael Grushko,
  • Prabhjot Singh,
  • Hani Jneid,
  • Afaq Motiwala,
  • Robert T. Faillace,
  • Seth I. Sokol

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041093
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 4
p. 1093

Abstract

Read online

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether early initiation of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism is associated with improved in-hospital outcomes. A retrospective cohort was extracted from the 2016–2019 National Inpatient Sample database, consisting of 21,730 weighted admissions undergoing CDT acute PE. From the time of admission, the sample was divided into early (48 h). Outcomes were measured using regression analysis and propensity score matching. No significant differences in mortality, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, or intracranial hemorrhage (p > 0.05) were found between the early and late CDT groups. Late CDT patients had a higher likelihood of receiving systemic thrombolysis (3.21 [2.18–4.74], p p p = 0.02), discharge disposition to care facilities (1.32 [1.14–1.53], p p p < 0.01). This study represents a comprehensive evaluation of outcomes associated with the time interval for initiating CDT, revealing reduced morbidity with early intervention. Additionally, it identifies predictors associated with delayed CDT initiation. The broader ramifications of these findings, particularly in relation to hospital resource utilization and health disparities, warrant further exploration.

Keywords