Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, United States
Qihong Lu
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
Akihiro Shimotake
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Takayuki Kikuchi
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Takeharu Kunieda
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
Susumu Miyamoto
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Ryosuke Takahashi
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Akio Ikeda
Department of Epilepsy, Movement Disorders and Physiology, Kyoto University Graduate School ofMedicine, Kyoto, Japan
Riki Matsumoto
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan; Division of Neurology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kusunoki-cho, Kobe, Japan
How does the human brain encode semantic information about objects? This paper reconciles two seemingly contradictory views. The first proposes that local neural populations independently encode semantic features; the second, that semantic representations arise as a dynamic distributed code that changes radically with stimulus processing. Combining simulations with a well-known neural network model of semantic memory, multivariate pattern classification, and human electrocorticography, we find that both views are partially correct: information about the animacy of a depicted stimulus is distributed across ventral temporal cortex in a dynamic code possessing feature-like elements posteriorly but with elements that change rapidly and nonlinearly in anterior regions. This pattern is consistent with the view that anterior temporal lobes serve as a deep cross-modal ‘hub’ in an interactive semantic network, and more generally suggests that tertiary association cortices may adopt dynamic distributed codes difficult to detect with common brain imaging methods.