Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health (Jan 2023)

Safe and valid? A systematic review of the psychometric properties of culturally adapted depression scales for use among Indigenous populations

  • Michelle Yang,
  • Quinta Seon,
  • Liliana Gomez Cardona,
  • Maharshee Karia,
  • Gajanan Velupillai,
  • Valérie Noel,
  • Outi Linnaranta

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.52
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Implementing culturally sensitive psychometric measures of depression may be an effective strategy to improve acceptance, response rate, and reliability of psychological assessment among Indigenous populations. However, the psychometric properties of depression scales after cultural adaptation remain unclear. Methods We screened the Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, Global Health, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases through three levels of search terms: Depression, Psychometrics, and Indigenous, following the PRISMA guidelines. We assessed metrics for reliability (including Cronbach’s alpha), validity (including fit indices), and clinical utility (including predictive value). Results Across 31 studies included the review, 13 different depression scales were adapted through language or content modification. Sample populations included Indigenous from the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. Most cultural adaptations had strong psychometric properties; however, few and inconsistent properties were reported. Where available, alphas, inter-rater and test–retest reliability, construct validity, and incremental validity often indicated increased cultural sensitivity of adapted scales. There were mixed results for clinical utility, criterion validity, cross-cultural validity, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, predictive value, and likelihood ratio. Conclusions Modifications to increase cultural relevance have the potential to improve fit and acceptance of a scale by the Indigenous population, however, these changes may decrease specificity and negative predictive value. There is an urgent need for suitable tools that are useful and reliable for identifying Indigenous individuals for clinical treatment of depression. This awaits future work for optimal specificity and validated cut-off points that take into account the high prevalence of depression in these populations.

Keywords