A systematic review of the development and application of home cage monitoring in laboratory mice and rats
Pia Kahnau,
Paul Mieske,
Jenny Wilzopolski,
Otto Kalliokoski,
Silvia Mandillo,
Sabine M. Hölter,
Vootele Voikar,
Adriana Amfim,
Sylvia Badurek,
Aleksandra Bartelik,
Angela Caruso,
Maša Čater,
Elodie Ey,
Elisabetta Golini,
Anne Jaap,
Dragan Hrncic,
Anna Kiryk,
Benjamin Lang,
Natasa Loncarevic-Vasiljkovic,
Hamid Meziane,
Aurelija Radzevičienė,
Marion Rivalan,
Maria Luisa Scattoni,
Nicolas Torquet,
Julijana Trifkovic,
Brun Ulfhake,
Christa Thöne-Reineke,
Kai Diederich,
Lars Lewejohann,
Katharina Hohlbaum
Affiliations
Pia Kahnau
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R)
Paul Mieske
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R)
Jenny Wilzopolski
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R)
Otto Kalliokoski
Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Copenhagen
Silvia Mandillo
Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council CNR
Sabine M. Hölter
Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Centre for Environmental Health
Vootele Voikar
Neuroscience Center, Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki
Adriana Amfim
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Spiru Haret University
Sylvia Badurek
Preclinical Phenotyping Facility, Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (VBCF), member of the Vienna Biocenter (VBC)
Aleksandra Bartelik
International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne’s University Hospital Brno
Angela Caruso
Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Research Coordination and Support Service
Maša Čater
Department of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana
Elodie Ey
Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Inserm, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258
Elisabetta Golini
Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Research Council CNR
Anne Jaap
Institute of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin
Dragan Hrncic
Institute of Medical Physiology “Richard Burian”, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade
Anna Kiryk
Laboratory of Preclinical Testing of Higher Standard, Neurobiology Center, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Science
Benjamin Lang
Institute of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin
Natasa Loncarevic-Vasiljkovic
iNOVA4Health, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS, FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Hamid Meziane
Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, INSERM, Institut Clinique de La Souris (ICS), CELPHEDIA, PHENOMIN
Aurelija Radzevičienė
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Medical Academy, Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology
Marion Rivalan
Research Institute for Experimental Medicine (FEM) and NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Animal Behaviour Phenotyping Facility, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Maria Luisa Scattoni
Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Research Coordination and Support Service
Nicolas Torquet
Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Inserm, IGBMC, Institut Clinique de la Souris (ICS), CELPHEDIA, PHENOMIN, UMR 7104- UMR-S 1258
Julijana Trifkovic
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, University of East Sarajevo
Brun Ulfhake
Div. Clinical Physiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet
Christa Thöne-Reineke
Institute of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin
Kai Diederich
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R)
Lars Lewejohann
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R)
Katharina Hohlbaum
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R)
Abstract Background Traditionally, in biomedical animal research, laboratory rodents are individually examined in test apparatuses outside of their home cages at selected time points. However, the outcome of such tests can be influenced by various factors and valuable information may be missed when the animals are only monitored for short periods. These issues can be overcome by longitudinally monitoring mice and rats in their home cages. To shed light on the development of home cage monitoring (HCM) and the current state-of-the-art, a systematic review was carried out on 521 publications retrieved through PubMed and Web of Science. Results Both the absolute (~ × 26) and relative (~ × 7) number of HCM-related publications increased from 1974 to 2020. There was a clear bias towards males and individually housed animals, but during the past decade (2011–2020), an increasing number of studies used both sexes and group housing. In most studies, animals were kept for short (up to 4 weeks) time periods in the HCM systems; intermediate time periods (4–12 weeks) increased in frequency in the years between 2011 and 2020. Before the 2000s, HCM techniques were predominantly applied for less than 12 h, while 24-h measurements have been more frequent since the 2000s. The systematic review demonstrated that manual monitoring is decreasing in relation to automatic techniques but still relevant. Until (and including) the 1990s, most techniques were applied manually but have been progressively replaced by automation since the 2000s. Independent of the year of publication, the main behavioral parameters measured were locomotor activity, feeding, and social behaviors; the main physiological parameters were heart rate and electrocardiography. External appearance-related parameters were rarely examined in the home cages. Due to technological progress and application of artificial intelligence, more refined and detailed behavioral parameters have been investigated in the home cage more recently. Conclusions Over the period covered in this study, techniques for HCM of mice and rats have improved considerably. This development is ongoing and further progress as well as validation of HCM systems will extend the applications to allow for continuous, longitudinal, non-invasive monitoring of an increasing range of parameters in group-housed small rodents in their home cages.