Root Trait Diversity in Field Grown Durum Wheat and Comparison with Seedlings
Ridha Boudiar,
Alejandra Cabeza,
Miriam Fernández-Calleja,
Antonio Pérez-Torres,
Ana M. Casas,
Juan M. González,
Abdelhamid Mekhlouf,
Ernesto Igartua
Affiliations
Ridha Boudiar
Biotechnology Research Center (CRBt), UV 03, P.O. Box E73, Nouvelle Ville Ali Mendjli, Constantine 25016, Algeria
Alejandra Cabeza
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, EEAD-CSIC, Avenida Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
Miriam Fernández-Calleja
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, EEAD-CSIC, Avenida Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
Antonio Pérez-Torres
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, EEAD-CSIC, Avenida Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
Ana M. Casas
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, EEAD-CSIC, Avenida Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
Juan M. González
Department of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, University of Alcalá, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
Abdelhamid Mekhlouf
Laboratoire d’Amélioration et de Développement de la Production Végétale et Animale (LADPVA), University of Ferhat ABBAS (UFAS-Sétif1), Sétif 19000, Algeria
Ernesto Igartua
Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, EEAD-CSIC, Avenida Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
Roots are important for crop adaptation, particularly in dryland environments. We evaluated root development of 37 durum wheat genotypes (modern cultivars and landraces) in the field at the adult plant stage, through a shovelomics approach. Large genotypic variability was found for root traits. Differences between the landraces and modern cultivars were the main driver of this variation, with landraces showing higher plant vigor for roots and shoots. Nonetheless, genotypic variation within groups was also observed, related to different models of root growth, largely independent of total root length. These two models represented root growth were oriented either to occupy more soil volume, or to occupy less soil volume with increased density. The field results were then compared with root data previously collected in seedlings using a filter paper-based method, to assess whether early root anticipated adult root features. Field plants showed a narrower root angle than seedlings. In particular, landraces presented a narrower root angle than cultivars, but only at seedling stage. Potentially useful correlations were found between the two growth stages for root length and number.