Environmental Research Letters (Jan 2023)

Comment on ‘In complexity we trust: learning from the socialist calculation debate for ecosystem management’

  • Logan Robert Bingham,
  • Lucy Van Kleunen,
  • Bohdan Kolisnyk,
  • Olha Nahorna,
  • Frederico Tupinambà-Simões,
  • Keith Reynolds,
  • Rasoul Yousefpour,
  • Thomas Knoke

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad0efb
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
p. 018002

Abstract

Read online

Using a metaphor based on a historical debate between socialist and free-market economists, Salliou and Stritih ( Environ. Res. Lett. 18 151001) advocate for decentralizing environmental management to harness emergent complexity and promote ecosystem health. Concerningly, however, their account seems to leave little room for top-down processes like government-led sustainability programs or centrally-planned conservation initiatives, the cornerstone of the post-2020 biodiversity framework. While we appreciate their call for humbleness, we offer a few words in defense of planning. Drawing on evidence from ecology, economics, and systems theory, we argue that (1) more complexity is not always better; (2) even if it were, mimicking minimally-regulated markets is probably not the best way to get it; and (3) sophisticated decision support tools can support humble planning under uncertainty. We sketch a re-interpretation of the socialist calculation debate that highlights the role of synthesis and theoretical pluralism. Rather than abandoning big-picture thinking, scientists must continue the difficult work of strengthening connections between and across multiple social, ecological, and policy scales.

Keywords