PLoS ONE (Jan 2023)

Genetically modified crops do not present variations in pollen viability and morphology when compared to their conventional counterparts.

  • Daniel Soares,
  • Hallison Vertuan,
  • Fabiana Bacalhau,
  • Marcia José,
  • Augusto Crivellari,
  • Gustavo G Belchior,
  • Geraldo U Berger

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285079
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 5
p. e0285079

Abstract

Read online

Modern agricultural biotechnologies, such as those derived from genetic modification, are solutions that can enable an increase in food production, lead to more efficient use of natural resources, and promote environmental impact reduction. Crops with altered genetic materials have been extensively subjected to safety assessments to fulfill regulatory requirements prior to commercialization. The Brazilian National Technical Biosafety Commission (CTNBio) provides provisions for commercial release of transgenic crops in Brazil, including requiring information on pollen dispersion ability as part of environmental risk assessment, which includes pollen viability and morphology studies. Here we present the pollen viability and morphology of non-transgenic conventional materials, single-event genetically modified (GM) products, and stacked GM products from soybean, maize and cotton cultivated in Brazil. Microscopical observation of stained pollen grain was conducted to determine the percentage of pollen viability as well as pollen morphology, which is assessed by measuring pollen grain diameter. The pollen viability and diameter of GM soybean, maize and cotton, evaluated across a number of GM events in each crop, were similar to the conventional non-GM counterparts. Pollen characterization data contributed to the detailed phenotypic description of GM crops, supporting the conclusion that the studied events were not fundamentally different from the conventional control.