Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (Sep 2022)

Knowledge, Attitude, Practices and Risk of Psychological Distress among Frontline Healthcare Workers Towards COVID-19 in Second Wave

  • Ram Milan Prasot,
  • Malik Faizan Ahmad,
  • Anand Bihari,
  • Ankit Srivastava,
  • Madhu Khan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/58156.16880
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 9
pp. LC06 – LC12

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: Frontline Healthcare Workers (F-HCWs) are at the front position for medical care against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic which has life-threatening potentials. Poor level of knowledge, practices and negative attitudes as well as high-risk of psychological distress among F-HCWs can directly lead to delayed diagnosis, treatment and poor infection control practices. Aim: To assess the level of Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) as well as risk of psychological distress among F-HCWs for COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This descriptive, hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted at Government Medical College, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India, located in a tertiary care centre in rural area from October 2021 to December 2021 among 223 F-HCWs using convenient sampling technique. To assess the level of KAP as well as risk of psychological distress among F-HCWs, a prevalidated structured questionnaire was used consisting of 15 knowledge questions, six attitude questions, 15 practices questions and six questions on risk of psychological distress. Chi-square test was performed to examine the association between risk of psychological distress and level of KAP as well as with demographic characteristics of F-HCWs. Results: Out of total 223 participants more than half of the physicians (52.9%) and one-third of staff nurses (35.9%) were from age group of 25-35 years, respectively. Majority of both physicians (57.1%) and staff nurses (87.6%) were married and had nuclear type of family, accounting for 64.3% and 74.5%, respectively. Most of the physicians (92.9%) had good level of knowledge but they had less positive attitude (84.3%) compared to staff nurses (92.8%). Majority of both physicians (64.3%) and staff nurses (58.2%) had no or low risk of psychological distress, while only a few of them had high level of risk. Conclusion: In this study, majority of F-HCWs reported overall ‘good’ level of KAP for prevention of COVID-19. As for risk of psychological distress was concerned, majority of F-HCWs had no or low risk.

Keywords