E3S Web of Conferences (Apr 2013)

Testing Single and Combinations of Amendments for Stabilization of Metals in Contrasting Extremely Contaminated Soils

  • Siebielec G.,
  • Kidd P.,
  • Pecio M.,
  • Galazka R.,
  • Mench M.,
  • Basta N.,
  • Chaney R. L.,
  • Álvarez-López V.,
  • Rodríguez-Garrido B.,
  • Vangronsveld J.,
  • Friesl-Hanl W.,
  • Cundy A.,
  • Puschenreiter M.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130101003
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 1
p. 01003

Abstract

Read online

Metals can be stabilized by soil amendments that increase metals adsorption or alter their chemical forms. Such treatments may limit the risk related to the contamination through reduction of metal transfer to the food chain (reduction of metal uptake by plants and its availability to soil organisms) and metals migration within the environment. There is a need for experiments comparing various soil amendments available at reasonable amounts under similar environmental conditions. The other question is whether all components of soil environment or soil functions are similarly protected after remediation treatment. We conducted a series of pot studies to test some traditional and novel amendments and their combinations. The treatments were tested for several highly Zn/Cd/Pb contaminated soils. Among traditional amendments composts were the most effective – they ensured plant growth, increased soil microbial activity, reduced Cd in earthworms, reduced Pb bioaccessibility and increased share of unavailable forms of Cd and Pb.

Keywords