Thrombosis Journal (Mar 2023)

Risk factors for thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Jiana Chen,
  • Zhiwei Zeng,
  • Zongwei Fang,
  • Fuxin Ma,
  • Meina Lv,
  • Jinhua Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-023-00467-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 8

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage has a high mortality rate, and many factors can cause intracranial hemorrhage. Until now, systematic reviews and assessments of the certainty of the evidence have not been updated. Aim We conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors for thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage. Method The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316160). All English studies that met the inclusion criteria published before January 2022 were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality and evidence of the included studies. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage were used as the outcome index of this review. Random or fixed-effect models were used in statistical methods. Results Of 6083 citations, we included 105 studies in our analysis. For intracranial hemorrhage, moderate-certainty evidence showed a probable association with age, National Institutes of Health stroke scale, leukoaraiosis, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, total cholesterol, proteinuria, fibrinogen levels, creatinine, homocysteine, early infarct signs, antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulant therapy; In addition, we found low-certainty evidence that there may be little to no association between risk of intracranial hemorrhage and weight, sex, platelet count, uric acid, albumin and white matter hyperintensity. Leukoaraiosis, cardiovascular disease, total cholesterol, white blood cell count, proteinuria, fibrinogen levels, creatinine, homocysteine and early CT hypodensities are not included in most intracranial hemorrhage risk assessment models. Conclusion This study informs risk prediction for thrombolysis-related intracranial hemorrhage, it also informs guidelines for intracranial hemorrhage prevention and future research.

Keywords