Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio for the Assessment of Bevacizumab-Associated Proteinuria in Patients with Gynecologic Cancers: A Diagnostic and Quality Improvement Study
Kuan-Ju Huang,
Wen-Chun Chang,
Chi-Hau Chen,
Wei-Chen Lin,
William Wei-Lin Pan,
Hao-I. Hsieh,
Yu-Hsiung Hsieh,
Lin-Hung Wei,
Bor-Ching Sheu
Affiliations
Kuan-Ju Huang
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin 640203, Taiwan
Wen-Chun Chang
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
Chi-Hau Chen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
Wei-Chen Lin
Xing Kang Clinic, Hualien 970, Taiwan
William Wei-Lin Pan
Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
Hao-I. Hsieh
Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
Yu-Hsiung Hsieh
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
Lin-Hung Wei
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
Bor-Ching Sheu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan
Proteinuria is a common adverse event arising from treatment with bevacizumab, requiring diagnostic testing via 24-h urine collection. However, this method is cumbersome. We assessed urine screenings in gynecologic cancer patients from February 2021 to May 2022. Along with a simple urine dipstick (UD), the urine microalbumin, total protein, and creatinine were measured and calculated as the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) and the urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR), which were further adjusted through the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations to be estimated and correlated with 24-h urine total protein content. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was used for cost analysis. There were 129 urine samples from 36 patients. The sensitivity and specificity for the UACR were 0.56 and 0.97, and for the UPCR, 0.71 and 0.88, respectively. The 24-h TP correlated strongly with the UACR (r = 0.75; p p p < 0.001). The UPCR saves one unnecessary 24-h urine test for less than a dollar compared to a simple UD. The results indicate that using the UPCR could enhance diagnostic accuracy, lower costs, and reduce unnecessary 24-h urine sampling.