Influence of mixing supplements (dry or liquid) with monensin or soluble protein on the feeding value of finishing diets for feedlot cattle

Abstract

The influence of supplement form (dry vs. liquid) on the feeding value of diets for feedlot cattle was evaluated. Treatments were: (1) dry supplement (DS); (2) liquid supplement (LS, all supplemental macro- and micro-minerals, salt, monensin and urea provided as a uniform blend with cane molasses; (3) LS minus monensin, that was provided in a 3% premix with dried distillers grains plus solubles before combination into a complete mixed diet (LS-MON) and (4) LS, except that condensed molasses solubles replaced 41% (DM basis) of the cane molasses solids (LSUF). In a 112-day trial involving 160 Holstein steers (473 ± 32 kg) cattle fed DS, LS, LS-MON and LSUF diets had similar (P > .10) ADG, DMI, feed efficiency and estimated dietary NE. The effects on characteristics of digestion were evaluate using four Holstein steers with cannulas in rumen and proximal duodenum. There were no treatment effects (P > .10) on ruminal digestion of OM, and feed N, microbial efficiency and ruminal N efficiency. It is concluded that the form of incorporation of minor dietary ingredients during batch mixing (dry premix or in combination with a liquid carrier) will not appreciably affect the feeding value of growing-finishing diets for feedlot cattle.

Keywords

• Liquid supplements
• ionophore
• soluble protein
• steers