Optimizing Outcomes in Distal Tibial Deformity Correction: The Role of Supramalleolar Osteotomy with Computer‐assisted Hexapod External Fixator

Abstract

Objective Distal tibial deformities can significantly impact patients if left uncorrected, often leading to pain, alterations in gait, and the eventual development of post‐traumatic arthritis. The criteria for surgical correction in these patients continues to be a subject of debate, while supramalleolar osteotomy (SMO) is an effective method for correcting distal tibial deformities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical results of SMO using internal fixation or using computer‐assisted hexapod external fixator in the treatment of distal tibial deformity. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 290 patients who underwent SMO between June 2015 and January 2023. Forty‐four patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among the participants, 19 underwent SMO combined with a computer‐assisted hexapod external fixator, while 25 received SMO with plate and screw internal fixation. The tibial anterior surface (TAS) angle, tibial lateral surface (TLS) angle, the tibiotalar (TT) angle and the talocrural (TC) angle were assessed on weight‐bearing X‐ray films. Functional assessments were performed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle‐hindfoot score. Results The study followed patients for an average duration of 31.7 ± 15.3 months, with a range from 12 to 67 months. Successful bone union was achieved in all cases. For patients treated with the computer‐assisted hexapod external fixator, significant improvements were observed: the mean deviation in sagittal plane deformity parameters decreased from 14.3 ± 10.4 degrees preoperatively to 2.8 ± 3.8 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). Similarly, coronal plane deformity parameters showed a reduction from 25.9 ± 22.5 degrees preoperatively to 5.9 ± 11.0 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). The AOFAS ankle‐hindfoot score improved markedly from 66.0 ± 14.9 to 86.1 ± 11.7 points (p < 0.05). For patients undergoing internal fixation, the absolute difference in coronal plane parameters improved from 15.4 ± 12.6 degrees preoperatively to 3.7 ± 3.4 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.05). A significant enhancement in AOFAS ankle‐hindfoot score was also noted, increasing from 68.3 ± 14.3 points to 79.4 ± 13.5 points (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in gender, side, follow‐up time, postoperative deviation of deformity, pre‐ or postoperative AOFAS between the two groups. Conclusion In conclusion, comprehensive preoperative planning of SMO combined with either internal fixation or a hexapod external fixator for treating distal tibial deformities can achieve satisfactory outcomes. The utilization of a computer‐assisted hexapod external fixator facilitates a gradual and precise correction process, which proved to be an effective and relatively safe method.

Keywords

• External fixation
• Supramalleolar osteotomy
• Tibial deformity