Revision Total Ankle Arthroplasty Outcomes in a Large Single-Center Series: Evaluation of Coronal Plane Deformity Correction and Patient Reported Measures

Abstract

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: As total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) rises in popularity nationwide, the incidence of major complications and need for revision TAA will continue to increase. A better understanding of the ability to durably correct deformity and improve patient reported outcomes (PROs) in the TAA revision setting is paramount for surgeons facing the impending wave of failed TAA. Thus, the purpose of this study was to present the largest single-center case series of revision TAA to date and to evaluate improvement in PROs and maintenance of correction of coronal plane deformity in patients undergoing this procedure. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective review of 87 revision TAAs performed between 2007 and 2022. Reoperations for cyst formations only or without metallic component exchange were excluded. The two most common implants used for revision TAA were Inbone II (n=65) and Inbone I (n=14). Mean follow-up was 2.8 ± 2.9 years. Data on patient preoperative characteristics, concurrent procedures, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome measures were time to major complication, reoperation, and infection. Secondary outcomes included PROs and correction of coronal plane deformity measured from both the tibial plafond and talar articulating surface from pre- to post-operatively. Cox regression analyses were performed to compute survivorship. Results: The most common concurrent procedures performed concomitantly with revision TAA were gastrocnemius recession (n=31, 35.6%), subtalar arthrodesis (n=18, 20.7%), and talonavicular arthrodesis (n=5, 5.7%). Mean preoperative coronal plane deformity measured off both the tibial plafond and talar articular surface improved after revision TAA. 1- and 5-year survivorship from major complication, reoperation, and infection is shown in Table 2. Fourteen patients underwent subsequent revision, including TAA (n= 6, 6.9%), arthrodesis (n= 4, 4.6%), below-the-knee amputation (n= 2, 2.3%), or implantation of an antibiotic spacer (n= 2, 2.3%). At one-year postoperatively, mean VAS pain score, SF36, and AOFAS Hindfoot score was 18.2 ± 16.0, 73.0 ± 13.3, and 68.8 ±:9.3, respectively, representing an improvement in PROs after revision TAA. Conclusion: In the largest single-center series of patients undergoing single or double component exchange revision TAA, we demonstrate durable improvements in coronal plane deformity measured off both the tibial plafond and talar articular surface. We also noted 63.0% survivorship with regards to reoperation and improvements in average PROs across the cohort. Overall, revision TAA is a successful procedure, but is associated with higher failure rates at 5 years than primary TAA.