Measuring and comparing in-situ CO2 and CO profiles with satellite observations and model data

Abstract

Accurate measurements of the vertical distribution of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere are critical to validate the vertical columns recorded by satellite and ground-based spectrometers and to estimate sources and sinks of CO2. This work describes an in-situ air-sampler system (Aircore). Profiles of CO2 and carbon monoxide (CO) were retrieved from two soundings of this system in Xilin Hot on 13 and 14 June 2018, and compared with observations from the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), and Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS). The column-averaged mixing ratio of CO (XCO) monitored by TROPOMI agreed well with that calculated from the in-situ CO profile, with a small mean difference of 5 ± 1.89 ppb. The column-averaged mixing ratio of CO2 (XCO2) monitored by OCO-2 also agreed well with that calculated from the in-situ CO2 profile, with a slight bias of 0.4 ± 0.6 ppm. The OCO-2 a posteriori profile had an obvious bias compared with the in-situ CO2 profile on 13 June, with an underestimation between 600 hPa and 250 hPa and an overestimation below 600 hPa. CAMS also had the same bias compared with the in-situ CO profile; however, CAMS agreed well with the in-situ CO profile on 14 June in the troposphere because a weak cold vortex passed Xilin Hot on 13 June and disappeared on 14 June. In the stratosphere, there were significant biases in the vertical degradation. The striking agreement between the column-averaged mixing ratios and the differences in the vertical distribution suggests new exciting applications for the profile product.

Keywords

• aircore
• greenhouse gas
• profile