Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients Receiving Dialysis: A National Study From Taiwan

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: We aimed to study the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients receiving dialysis. Study Design: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Setting & Participants: This population-based study identified patients receiving dialysis hospitalized for coronary revascularization between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2015, in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Exposures: Patients received percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass grafting. Outcomes: The study outcomes were all-cause mortality, in-hospital mortality, and repeat revascularization. Analytical Approach: Propensity scores were used to match patients. Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression models were constructed to examine associations between revascularization strategies and mortality. Interval Cox models were fitted to estimate time-varying hazards during different periods. Results: A total of 1,840 propensity score-matched patients receiving dialysis were analyzed. Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent; crude mortality rate 12.5% vs 3.3%; adjusted OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 3.42-7.97; P < 0.001) and longer hospitalization duration (median [IQR], 20 [14-30] days vs 3 [2-8] days; P < 0.001). After discharge, repeat revascularization, acute coronary syndrome, and repeat hospitalization all occurred more frequently in the percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent group. Importantly, with a median follow-up of 2.8 years, coronary artery bypass grafting was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause overall mortality (adjusted HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35; P = 0.006) in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses yielded consistent results. Limitations: This was an observational study with mainly Asian ethnicity. Conclusions: Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent may be associated with better survival than coronary artery bypass grafting in patients receiving dialysis. Future studies are warranted to confirm this finding. Plain-Language Summary: Although coronary artery bypass grafting offers better long-term survival in the general population than percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent, patients receiving dialysis may be too frail to tolerate the increased perioperative mortality risk of coronary artery bypass grafting. In this retrospective study in a national cohort of patients receiving dialysis from Taiwan, percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and better long-term survival when compared with coronary artery bypass grafting. Subsequent acute coronary syndrome, repeat revascularization, and rehospitalization were noted more frequently in the percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent group. These findings may suggest percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent as a safe revascularization strategy for patients receiving dialysis.

Keywords

• Coronary artery bypass grafting
• coronary revascularization
• dialysis
• drug-eluting stent
• end-stage kidney disease
• mortality