Impact of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness and surface geometry in class II direct composite restoration in-vitro

Abstract

Abstract Background Poor contact tightness and contour in class II composite restorations are significant problems in clinical practice. They affect occlusal stability and periodontal health. The aim of this study was to evaluate proximal contact tightness and contour established after completing class II direct composite restorations using two pre-contoured matrix systems. Methods Standardized mesio-occlusal cavities were prepared in twenty typodont lower right first permanent molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into two groups according to matrix system: Group 1, Sectional matrix system with a separation ring (Palodent V3); and Group 2, Circumferential matrix system with integrated tightener (Palodent 360). Contact tightness was evaluated using universal testing machine. Area, depth and curvature radius of proximal surface concavity in the restoration were evaluated using contact stylus profilometer. T-test was used for comparison between groups. Results Sectional matrix showed higher contact tightness than circumferential matrix system. The results of proximal surface concavity in the restoration showed significantly higher area and depth of concavity with lower radius of curvature in circumferential matrix compared to sectional matrix. Conclusions The use of separation ring with sectional matrix provides superior contact tightness compared to circumferential matrix. However, both matrix systems presented some deficiency regarding proximal contour of direct class II resin composite restoration.

Keywords

• Circumferential matrix
• Contact tightness
• Pre-contoured matrix
• Restoration proximal contour
• Sectional matrix