Harm Reduction Journal (Oct 2009)

Surveillance indicators for potential reduced exposure products (PREPs): developing survey items to measure awareness

  • McNeill Ann,
  • Marcus Stephen,
  • Hartman Anne,
  • Cummings K Michael,
  • Allen Jane,
  • Garrett Catherine A,
  • Biener Lois,
  • Bogen Karen,
  • O'Connor Richard J,
  • Parascandola Mark,
  • Pederson Linda

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7517-6-27
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
p. 27

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Over the past decade, tobacco companies have introduced cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products (known as Potential Reduced Exposure Products, PREPs) with purportedly lower levels of some toxins than conventional cigarettes and smokeless products. It is essential that public health agencies monitor awareness, interest, use, and perceptions of these products so that their impact on population health can be detected at the earliest stages. Methods This paper reviews and critiques existing strategies for measuring awareness of PREPs from 16 published and unpublished studies. From these measures, we developed new surveillance items and subjected them to two rounds of cognitive testing, a common and accepted method for evaluating questionnaire wording. Results Our review suggests that high levels of awareness of PREPs reported in some studies are likely to be inaccurate. Two likely sources of inaccuracy in awareness measures were identified: 1) the tendency of respondents to misclassify "no additive" and "natural" cigarettes as PREPs and 2) the tendency of respondents to mistakenly report awareness as a result of confusion between PREPs brands and similarly named familiar products, for example, Eclipse chewing gum and Accord automobiles. Conclusion After evaluating new measures with cognitive interviews, we conclude that as of winter 2006, awareness of reduced exposure products among U.S. smokers was likely to be between 1% and 8%, with the higher estimates for some products occurring in test markets. Recommended measurement strategies for future surveys are presented.